Headlines
Published On:16 January 2012
Posted by Indian Muslim Observer

GUEST EDITORIAL: AMU again becoming the leader of Muslim Education

By Kaleem Kawaja

In the modern history of the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent after the end of the six hundred year long Muslim ruling era in 1857, their emancipation by acquiring modern education starting in late 1800s represents a very courageous turning point. The widespread British suppression and degrading of Muslims of all classes following the failure of the 1857 revolution was savage and impacted all classes of Muslims. However in the late 1800s a few Muslim leaders across the country embarked on a path to emancipate the Muslim community through modern education by building modern Muslim educational institutions. Two of them who succeded and whose institutions have continued to flourish for over a hundred years now are Sir Syed Ahmad Khan of Aligarh and Badruddin Tyebjee of Bombay.

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan built the Mohammadon Anglo Oriental School and College in Aligarh in 1874, where he introduced curriculam from the prominent universities of Britain and employed British teachers. Also in 1874 Badruddin Tyabjee built the Anjuman Islam school and college in Bombay. Today over a hundred years later the initiative in Aligarh has blossomed into the large and renowned Aligarh Muslim University (AMU). The other initiative in Bombay has blossomed into the Anjuman Islam Colleges and schools numbering about 80. In the pre-1947 era both institutrions prospered with encouragement from the then British-Indian government. The Anjuman Islam colleges/schools were not built as a residential and unitary institutions, but AMU was built as one.

While Anjuman emphasized education of Muslims but not the handling of their social-political issues, AMU did both with a view to create the future Muslim leadership. As the Pakistan movement heated up in north India in the 1930s, willingly or unwillingly the political future of the Muslims of India became a major feature of AMU. After 1947 while Anjuman Islam, not having been sucked into the vortex of the Pakistan movement did not suffer significant political recriminations in Hindu majority India, AMU suffered grievous discrimination for about a quarter century. Thus in post-independence India AMU became much more than a Muslim university; it became a symbol of the middle class Muslims and a beacon of hope for the emancipation of the community.

Gradually over the years as the political parties and forces have realized the importance of Muslims as an integral part of India and AMU too has shed its excluvist tendencies, AMU is again being looked upon by succesive governments and parties in power as one of the major avenues through whom the Muslim community should be approached.

In the last several decades the educational backwardness of Indian Muslims and its contribution to the overall socioeconomic backwardness of the community has become an open gnawing wound. The 2007 Justice Sachar Committee report on this subject has put the government's responsibility to bring educational empowerment of the Muslim community on the front burner. Not only Congress party, even the BJP simply can not ignore this need. It is this realization that led the government to plan the building of several higher educational colleges for Muslims in various Muslim concentration districts in the country that could grow in due course of time into Muslim universities, as recommended by the Sachar Committee.

However, the government faced a major problem that the Indian constitution prohibits building such facilities for only one religious community and the sizeable anti-Muslim forces are in no mood to let that happen. That is when they thought of expanding an existing Muslim university by building its remote centers across the country. They had only two universities to chose from; AMU and Jamia Milia Islamia. AMU is far more well established with a well established system of instruction, curriculam, research, academic management, residential facilities for students, large colleges of Medicine, Engineering, Law, Business Management, Science etc. Also in comparison, AMU is a century old internationaly known Muslim university. Thus AMU became the government's choice.

With the planned establishment of five AMU centers of higher education in places far away from Aligarh, three of which are well underway in Murshidabad (West Bengal), Mallapuram (Kerala), Kishanganj (Bihar), AMU is being transformed from being a single university for Muslims into a university system for Indian Muslims. While AMU does not have a reservation for Muslim students it does have a reservation for "internal students". That means preferential admission of AMU's own students to its professional and higher science colleges. Since the dominant culture and ethos of AMU is Muslim-centric most students at highersecondary level where students are relatively young tend to be Muslims. So that makes the internal student reservation an indirect reservation for Muslims.

This system of "internal students quota" has been upheld by the Courts as being legal, as under Article 30 of the Indian Constitution minorities are allowed to set up their own systems of management. Also this is not a reservation for Muslims as anyone is allowed to become an internal student at AMU. By virtue of being centers of AMU, the internal student reservation system can be extended to its remote centers withhout infringing any laws of the nation. Thus the government can fund the establishment of the AMU remote centers. It should be noted that to- date none of the anti-Muslim parties and groups including BJP have raised any voice of protest against the establishment of remote AMU Centers funded by the government.

The plan calls for the five AMU Centers to grow under the administration at AMU, Aligarh, transfering academic management knowhow, management of teching and student bodies, curriculam etc from AMU to its remote centers. The expectation is that in due course of time the remote centers will become their own Muslim universities. Since all AMU remote centers are being built in heavy Muslim concentration districts it is natural that it will spread higher education in the educationally backward Muslim community. That will bring empowerment and socioeconomic growth to the backward Muslim community in due course of time.

It should be noted that the first Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) was built in Kharagpur, West Bengal in 1954. Therafter utlizing IIT Kharagpur's system of academic administration, curriculam, bodies of teachers and students etc more autonomous IITs were built in Bombay, Madras, Kanpur, Delhi and later in Roorkee and Gauhati. From one IIT it became an IIT system. Today all these IITs have developed their own culture and system and the coordination among them is happening very successfully. The plan for the AMU system and its centers expects to emulate the successful IIT model.

Just as in the pre-1947 era AMU was a leader of higher education for Muslims in the Indian subcontinent and Muslims came from all over the country to study there, today AMU is again becoming the leader, leading the resurgence of higher education in the backward Muslim community all over the country, from West Bengal to Kerala. In the process AMU is also on the path to lead the socioeconomic emancipation of the depressed Muslim community on an all-India basis.

Most Indian Muslims and alumnus of AMU have welcomed this government initiative. But a few in the AMU community are apprehensive that the expansion of AMU from one university in Aligarh to the AMU system spread over the entire country may cause the dilution of the priveleges they enjoy at Aligarh. Their anxities are imaginary and a generic reaction to change per se. But change is the law of nature and after 130 years AMU too can not remain static. 

More than anything AMU must respond to the challenge that the extraordinary educational backwardness of the Indian Muslim community represents, and must lead the path forward to the uplift of the entire Indian Muslim community. The expansion of AMU also represents the fulfilment of the vision of AMU's founders who saw AMU's future not just as one college but as a catalyst for the establishment of clones of AMU in Muslim communities throughout the country that will emancipate the entire community.

[Kaleem Kawaja is a community activist based at Washington DC. He can be reached on: kaleemkawaja@gmail.com]

About the Author

Posted by Indian Muslim Observer on January 16, 2012. Filed under , , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Feel free to leave a response

By Indian Muslim Observer on January 16, 2012. Filed under , , , . Follow any responses to the RSS 2.0. Leave a response

2 comments for "GUEST EDITORIAL: AMU again becoming the leader of Muslim Education"

  1. READ ASSHOLES WHAT WORLD HAS TO SAY ABOUT
    your SATAN RELIGON.
    Jew Lover from CrazyIslam.com:
    "Where Islam is, peace isn't."
    Winston Churchill:
    "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides WILL GLADSTONE- Prime Minister of Great Britian:
    “Qur’an… an accursed book… So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.”Geert Wilders - MP of Netherlands:
    ”“I view Islam not as a religion, but as a dangerous, totalitarian ideology—equal to communism and fascism. Aren’t I allowed to say so?”
    John Wesley:
    “Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it…have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations are vanished from the earth! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.”

    Fulton J. Sheen:
    “Today [1950], the hatred of the Moslem countries against the West is becoming hatred against Christianity itself. Although the statesmen have not yet taken it into account, there is still grave danger that the temporal power of Islam may return and, with it, the menace that it may shake off a West which has ceased to be Christian, and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world power.”

    Edward Augustus Freeman:
    ”[Islam] is essentially an obstructive, intolerant system… It has consecrated despotism; it has consecrated polygamy; it has consecrated slavery. It has declared war against every other creed; it has claimed to be at least dominant in every land… When it ceases to have an enemy to contend against, it sinks into sluggish stupidity and into a barbarism far viler… It must have an enemy; if cut off…from conflict with the infidel, it finds its substitute in sectarian hatred of brother Moslems…”

    Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Paleologus 1391:
    "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."



    Here's what Muslims themselves have to say.

    Ayatollah Khomeini:
    “Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world…. Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers]? Islam says: Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us? Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to the enemy? Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other [Koranic] verses and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”

    Osama bin Laden:
    “We should fully understand our religion. Fighting is a part of our religion and our Sharia [Islamic legal code]. Those who love God and his Prophet and this religion cannot deny that. Whoever denies even a minor tenet of our religion commits the gravest sin in Islam."

    Comments (3)

  2. Famous Quotes about Islam
    Here you'll find famous quotes regarding Islam. From Adolph Hitler and Osama Bin Laden, to Winston Churchill and John Quincy Adams.

    Jew Lover from CrazyIslam.com:
    "Where Islam is, peace isn't."

    WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE (Adam's capital letters)."

    Will Gladstone - Prime Minister of Great Britian:
    “Qur’an… an accursed book… So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.”

    John Wesley:
    “Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it…have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations are vanished from the earth! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.”

    Adolph Hitler:
    “Only in the Roman Empire and in Spain under Arab domination has culture been a potent factor. Under the Arab, the standard attained Charles Martel not been victorious at Fulton J. Sheen:
    “Today [1950], the hatred of the Moslem countries against the West is becoming hatred as a great anti-Christian world power.”

    Edward Augustus Freeman:
    ”[Islam] is essentially an obstructive, intolerant system… It has consecrated despotism; it has consecrated polygamy; it has consecrated slavery. It has declared war against every other creed; it has claimed to be at least dominant in every land… When it ceases to have an enemy to contend against, it sinks into sluggish stupidity and into a barbarism far viler… It must have an enemy; if cut off…from conflict with the infidel, it finds its substitute in sectarian hatred of brother Moslems…”

    Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Paleologus 1391:
    "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."


    .

    Ayatollah Khomeini:
    “Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world…. Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers]? Islam says: Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us? Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to the enemy? Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other [Koranic] verses and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”

    Osama bin Laden:
    “We should fully understand our religion. Fighting is a part of our religion and our Sharia [Islamic legal code]. Those who love God and his Prophet and this religion cannot deny that. Whoever denies even a minor tenet of our religion commits the gravest sin in Islam."

Leave a reply

Editor's Pick

SPECIAL REPORT: Indian religious leaders strongly protest against South Korean government hounding of Shincheonji Church despite cooperation to contain COVID-19 spread

By Danish Ahmad Khan The government of South Korea is pursuing a discriminatory policy towards Shincheonji Church while accusing it of COVI...

IMO Search Finder

Subscribe IMO

    Archive