SPECIAL REPORT: Chief Minister Narendra Modi eyes national role, but not much for Muslims in Swarnim Gujarat

Posted by Indian Muslim Observer | 30 September 2011 | Posted in ,

Gujarat CM Narendra Modi sets eyes on national role. His vibrant and Swarnim Gujarat has not much for Muslims. An inside story of another Gujarat, writes our senior colleague and IndianMuslimObserver.com Bureau Chief (Gujarat) Abdul Hafiz Lakhani

Ahmedabad: Do Muslims really have equal opportunities and infrastructure in Gujarat? Modi has won successive elections in Gujarat since 2002 even while his role in the riots was under probe by the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team. How do Muslims negotiate their rights as citizens with a government that has refused to even acknowledge the extent of the pogrom?

Rakhial is a lower middle-class neighbourhood located 5 km north of Maninagar, Chief Minister Modi’s constituency in east Ahmedabad. Of the three large housing colonies located here — Sukhram Nagar, Shivanand Nagar and Sundaram Nagar — Muslims live in the third. Built as a mixed colony in the 1970s, it became a ghetto after the 2002 riots.

National Highway 8 cuts through the settlement and Hindus and Muslims on either side of this refer to it as the “border”, a term common in several other Gujarat neighbourhoods where the two communities live cheek by jowl.

Besides this road that cuts through the colonies, a sharp contrast of infrastructure separates the Hindu and Muslim neighbourhoods; a contrast most telling and disturbing in the condition of government primary schools for which the state provides land, buildings and funds for maintenance and facilities like libraries.

A dilapidated structure with a tin roof broken at several places serves as the municipal primary school for 600 children in Muslim-dominated Sundaram Nagar. One part of this rundown building serves as a Gujarati medium school up to Class VII. At the other end, a tin-covered structure open on all sides is used as a classroom to teach Urdu to over 200 students in Classes I to IV.

Less than 2 km away, in the same municipal ward of Rajpur, a three-storey building serves as a Gujarati medium school up to Class VII in Hindu-dominated Shivanand Nagar. Sukhram Nagar has a Hindi medium school up to Class VII that is a three-storey building with stone mosaic work depicting Hindu goddesses.

“Those living here cannot afford to send their children to private schools and the government takes no responsibility to improve the school,” says Sheikh Ahesan, in his mid 20s, who started the Student Welfare and Education Trust in 2007.

Ahesan and his friends have provided floor mats to kids in the Sundaram Nagar municipal school. “Anyone could stand a fair chance by studying and looking for work in the private sector. But how will these children reach there when they do not get to go to a half-decent primary school?” asks Sheikh Usmaan, a member of the trust.

Muslim families living in Rakhiyal narrate countless struggles to get benefits such as educational loans. “For my MBA admission, I went with my uncle to ask Dena Bank for a Rs 1.25 lakh loan. They asked for collateral and discouraged me from applying. Then I got aid from a Muslim trust,” recounts Sheikh Shehzaad. The Central scheme he is referring to is one of the key proposals adopted after the publication of the 2005 Sachar Committee report that mandates banks to give educational loans up to Rs 4 lakh without any collateral to students from poor minority families.

“The bank is asking for income tax returns and PAN card. Where will we get this from?” asks Ghori Firdaus, a homeopathy student, about her experience at the State Bank of India that moved its branch from Sundaram Nagar to the Hindu-dominated Odhav area across the road after 2002. It is to help students like Firdaus, whose father is an autorickshaw driver, that the scheme has flexible rules — the family’s income certificate and an affidavit certifying religion from the Collector’s office are suffice to qualify.

“We are able to pool small amounts among ourselves to help these students but some months, especially during admission time, we don’t know what to do because we cannot risk rejection by these banks,” says Shehzaad.

A key finding of the Sachar Committee report was that drop-out rates are highest among Muslims. Their mean years of schooling are lower than SCs and STs at a little over three years. In 2008, the Centre started a scholarship scheme for minorities, to be shared in a 75:25 ratio between the Centre and state to encourage students from poor families to complete schooling.

Since the scheme started, Gujarat has let the funds lapse by not sending any proposal to the Centre for giving these scholarships.
At first, the state government found faults with the scheme saying this targets religious minorities and is discriminatory on “principles of equity and financial implications”.

The Gujarat High Court settled this question when it recognised the Central scheme as constitutionally valid in March 2009. This April, contradicting its own stand in an affidavit filed in response to the PIL in the high court, the government cited a scholarship for minorities that has existed in the state since 1979. It said, since this scheme exists, there is no need for implementing the Central scheme.

The state government added another argument in the affidavit. It said executing the Central scheme for a limited number of students — the Ministry of Minority Affairs (MMA) calculated 52,260 scholarships on the basis of population and income levels among Gujarat’s minorities — will cause “heartburn” among those minority students who do not enjoy the benefits.

But who is stopping the state government from covering the remaining students using additional funds? MMA data shows that in 2010-11, a less developed state like Rajasthan disbursed more than double the year’s target of 60,109 scholarships. Bihar also disbursed more than double its target of 1,45,809 scholarships. Uttar Pradesh disbursed over 130 percent of a target of 3,37,109, and West Bengal — that has one of the highest proportion of Muslims — disbursed 400 percent of its target of 2,22,309. In all these instances, state governments have increased their allocation because of the high quantum of applications; the Centre has matched their funds bearing 75 percent of the total cost.

[Abdul Hafiz Lakhani is a senior Journalist based at Ahmedabad, Gujarat. He is associated with IndianMuslimObserver.com as Bureau Chief (Gujarat). He can be reached at lakhani63@yahoo.com or on his cell 09228746770]

History of Urdu Journalism in India

Posted by Indian Muslim Observer | | Posted in

By Dr. Mrinal Chatterjee

Contrary to popular perception, Urdu is not the language of Muslims. It was a lashkari (soldier) language (the word ‘Urdu’ comes from the Turkish word ‘ordu’ meaning ‘camp’ or ‘army’), nourished during the period of Mughal emperor Shahjahahn. It had words from Persian and local languages. The purpose was to make communication easy among soldiers who were from different places: Arab, Turk and locals. Based on the Khariboli dialect of Delhi and Western Uttar Pradesh in the Indian subcontinent, Urdu developed under local Persian, Arabic, and Turkic influence over the course of almost 900 years. It began to take shape in what is now Uttar Pradesh, India during the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1527), and continued to develop under the Mughal Empire (1526–1858).

Urdu is written from right to left just like Arabic and Persian. Urdu has 39 basic letters and 13 extra characters, all together 52 and most of these letters are from Arabic and a small quantity from Persian. It has almost all the 'sounds' available in any other language spoken in the world.

The Persian newspapers of West Bengal were fore-runners of the Urdu press. After the decline of Persian as an official language, Urdu gained prominence.

The first newspaper of Urdu language was Jam-i-Jahan-Numa, founded by Harihar Dutta in 1822 in Kolkata (then Calcutta). He was the son of Tara Chand Dutta, eminent Bengali journalist and one of the founders of Bengali weekly Sambad Koumudi. Editor of this three page weekly paper was Sadasukhlal. After English and Bengali, it was the third language newspaper in India. It continued to be published till 1888.

On 14 January 1850, Munshi Harsukh Rai started the weekly Kohinoor, which had a remarkably high (for those times) circulation of 350 copies. In 1858, Manbir Kabiruddin started the Urdu Guide, the first Urdu daily, from Calcutta. Another important paper founded that year was Roznamha-e-Punjab from Lahore. Oudh Akhbar by Munshi Nawal Kishore was the first Urdu newspaper from Lucknow, also begun in 1858.

There was extensive growth in Urdu journalism from the 1850s till Independence in 1947.

The first Urdu newspapers of Delhi were Fawaid-ul-Nazarin and Kiran-us-Sadai, founded by Rama Chandra in 1852. The Urdu press in Delhi became highly critical of the British government. The best example of them is the Urdu Akhbar, edited by Syed Hasan, which highlighted many civic issues like drainage, sanitation, adulteration of food, and corruption.

In 1877, Maulvi Nasir Ali, one of the founders of Anjuman Islamia- the Islamic intellectual and political movement- founded 3 newspapers- Nusrat-ul-Akhbar, Nusrat-ul-Islam and Mihir-e-Darakhshan. All three focused on current civil and political affairs and were valuable aids of Muslim empowerment. In 1877, Oudh Punch, the first humour magazine in Urdu was started by Sajjid Hussain. The first women’s journal in Urdu was Akhbar-un-Nisa.

Darul Sultanat, one of the most important newspapers of 19th century was published in 1881 by Shaikh Ahsanullah Sandagiri Dehlawi from Kolkata. Mathura Prasad Savmar was its editor. It started as a weekly. Later it was made bi-weekly and then tri-weekly.

Urdu journalism took on a strongly nationalistic note towards the turn of the 20th century. Zameendar was started in Lahore in 1903. It was the first Urdu newspaper to subscribe to news agencies. Zameendar was intensely nationalistic, which boosted its circulation to over 30,000 copies. In 1902, Maulvi Sanaullah Khan started the weekly Watan, meaning motherland. Watan was intensely nationalistic and continued for 33 years. Maulana Muhammad Ali Jauhar started Naqeeb-e-Hamdard in 1912. Another powerful political periodical was the Madina, edited by Hamidul Ansari.

The greatest Urdu periodical that time was Al Hilal, started by Maulana Abul Kalam Azad. A weekly, Al-Hilal created political and religious consciousness among the Muslims. It was one of first Urdu newspapers which put equal importance on content and presentation including the layout and design. It was designed on the pattern of Egyptian newspapers. But its greatest asset was the content. It addressed the readers in a new language and style of expression.

In 1919, the Pratap was started in Lahore by Mahshe Krishnan. It vigorously supported Gandhi’s policies and the Indian National Congress. It was a victim of government harassment and suspended publication several times. It had great influence among the Urdu reading Hindus of Punjab and Delhi.

In 1923, Swami Shraddhanand founded the Tej with Lala Deshbandhu Gupta as editor. It had a wide circulation in Rajasthan, U.P. and Delhi. It was confiscated several times by the government and banned in a number of princely states. In the same year, 1923, the Arya Samaj started the Milap, a daily in Lahore. It was known for its powerful nationalistic editorials. Jawaharlal Nehru founded Qaumi Awaaz in 1945.

Urdu journalism suffered heavily, during and after Partition. Riots in Lahore lead to mobs raiding the office of Milap and burning machines and newsprint. Its Managing Editor, Ranbir was stabbed and the paper was closed for six weeks. It then shifted to Delhi. Due to the unrest, the Pratap also shifted to Delhi.

At the time of partition there were 415 Urdu newspapers including all daily, weekly, fortnightly and monthly magazines. After partition 345 of them remained in India as owners of 70 newspapers migrated to Pakistan. As per the RNI report of 1957, there were 513 Urdu newspapers and the combined circulation was 7.48 lakh. Fifty years later the number of Urdu dailies alone was 3168 and the combined circulation of all Urdu newspapers was 1.7 crore as per RNI report 2007.
Some of the Urdu newspapers after partition in India are Dawat, now a bi-weekly, started by the Jamat-e-Islami Hind. Maulana Abdul Waheed Siddiqui started Nai Duniya, a popular Urdu weekly, which was later by his son Shaheed Siddiqui. The Sahara Group started a weekly-Aalmi Sahara. There are more number of Urdu newspapers published in Hyderabad including The Siasat Daily, The Munsif Daily, Indian Etemaad and Rehnuama E Deccan. In fact till 2006 Andhra Pradesh had the maximum number of registered Urdu newspapers (506) among all the states of India. Mumbai also have several Urdu publications including The Inquilab daily and Urdu Times. West Bengal, especially Kolkata also has a sizable number of Urdu publications. In 2005 there were five Urdu dailies in Kolkata: Azad Hind, Rozana Hind, Akhbaar-e-Mashrique, Aabshaar and Akkas.

After 1980s there was a gradual decline in the number of publications and readership of Urdu newspapers. Several publications ceased publication. For example, in West
Bengal Shan-e-Millat, Imroze, Asre-Jadeed, Ghazi and Iqra were closed.

However, in the first decade of the new millennium, a resurgence of sort was marked in Urdu media, with a number of new newspapers and television channels making their entry. The big media houses made their presence felt in Urdu media.

The major Urdu newspapers and television channels that are run by major media houses are Rashtria Sahara (launched by Sahara Group in 2006), Inquilab (Jagran group took over this Mumbai based Urdu newspaper in 2010), Azad Hind, Hind Samachar, ETV-Urdu, Aalami Sahara and Zee Salam. In 2011 Hyderabad based newspaper ‘Munsif’ launched its news channel whereas Mumbai based ‘Urdu Times’ will launch its print editions from Delhi and Lucknow shortly.

Hyderabad based Siyasat was the first Urdu newspaper to start a web edition in late 90s. Several other Urdu publications presently have their web editions.

Not many Urdu publications have appeared from Orissa, though the state has a sizable Urdu knowing population. In late eighties Eastern Media, publisher of Sambad started a Urdu weekly Sahara. It closed publication within one year.

[Dr. Mrinal Chatterjee is Professor at Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), Orissa. He can be contacted at mrinaliimc@yahoo.in]

The Purpose of Pakistan

Posted by Indian Muslim Observer | | Posted in , , , ,

[The IndianMuslimObserver.com received this highly informative and excellent article by Syed M. Hoda in which he has outlined the real purpose behind the creation of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. We don’t support the creation of Pakistan, which has been a potential troublemaker and not a well wisher of Indian Muslims. However, it is important that our readers should know the real facts. Syed M. Hoda writes: Assalam-o-alikum, I have worked on this article for more than a year. I wrote this article after doing several years of study of the history of sub-continent, and also of the Quran and Hadith. It may appear that this article is only about Pakistan, but after reading it you will find that it is about the whole Muslim ummah, actully it is about the whole world. Please let me know about your opinion. Wassalam. Regards, Syed M. Hoda,
E-mail: shoda@hotmail.com. – Danish Ahmad Khan, Founder-Editor, IndianMuslimObserver.com]

By Syed M. Hoda


This article is about the creation and purpose of Pakistan. I could have made this article into a small book, but I don't want any fame or fortune for myself, so I left it as an email.

There are two parts in this article. Part I is about the past and Part II is mostly about the future. I could have written this whole article without Part I, but I included it because my analysis suggests that the points mentioned in it are facts. But if you don't want to read it, then feel free to skip Part I and go to Part II directly.

I have primarily included Part I to show that human beings conspire and plan and then think that they are in control of all the affairs, but they are not. God Almighty is actually in control of everything, it is Allah (SWT) who is Qadir-e-Mutlaq and Khairul-Maakereen. For me Part I creates a nose which gets rubbed in Part II. Since a large part of Part II deals with the future events, therefore I have used a lot of references from Quran and Hadith which are the only authentic sources, and I have tried to present them in a practical, logical and chronological manner, and according to my understanding of these events as and when they will be happening in the future, in the real world.

If you do not agree with what I have written here, I will respect your opinion. But I would like to request just one thing from you-- Please save this article and compare it with the events when they will occur, as they will be occurring in the not too distant future. I may be wrong on some of the details of the events, or the order in which these events will occur could be different from mine, but the overall direction of the events and the overall direction in which our world is going will follow the pattern I have mentioned here. IMHO.

Part I

Pakistan is the only Muslim country in the world which was created in the name of Islam. The blood of more than two millions Muslims of India is in the foundation of this country, these people gave their lives (became Shaheed), and countless others suffered all kinds of hardships to bring this country into existence. So there is no doubt that Muslims of India were the main party who struggled really hard and gave huge amount of sacrifices to create Pakistan, and Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah was their leader and founder of Pakistan. But this is not all, there were some others parties also who participated in the creation of Pakistan. Among them there are some characters who would like to remain hidden, but I will attempt to bring them out in the open in this writing. InshaAllah.

Hindu participation in creating Pakistan:

I will start this by analyzing the term "Hindu". This word was coined by Muslims when they came to India and then they started calling all locals as Hindu from the Arabic word Hind for the land of sub-continent, it was like Englishman calling every native people "Indians". And with this one word the Muslims united all the local pagans living in the Indian sub-continent into one community or one entity. Before that they used to be Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras or Chandalas (Untouchables) etc.

Now coming to the early 20th century, British realized in the beginning of the 20th century that they will not be able to rule over India forever, so they needed a transition plan. But transition to whom? They took India from the Muslims, but there is no way they were going to give the whole India back to the Muslims. The only group they trusted and could hand over the power to were the Upper Caste (Hindus), but the Upper Caste were a very small minority in India.

How could they transfer power to such a small minority which was less than 5% of the total population?

Tell me (you the reader)... how would you have done it if this task was assigned to you?

Well... the plan they came up with was a multi-fold and multi-step plan, and a very clever one. First start by dividing the population in two main groups by using violence, then, partition the country, then... Well, we will talk about this later in the article.

To accomplish the first task of violence against Muslims, the Upper Caste engineered movements like the Shuddhi Movement and then launched hundreds of riots in 1920's and 1930's against Muslims and they termed those riots as "Hindu-Muslim" riot. It was a stupid mistake that we Muslims also called them Hindu-Muslim riots, instead of calling them what they were, the "Upper Caste-Muslim riots". By doing that we Muslims already gave away a large percentage of Indian population (the Lower Caste) into the command and control of these clever Upper Caste leaders, who accepted this gift without even saying ‘Thank You’. If Muslims have called it a "Brahmin-Muslim" riot or "Upper Caste-Muslim" riot then just by using this nomenclature we could have kept a sympathetic and friendly population of Lower Caste Indians, because we Muslims never had any problems or issues with the Lower Caste people. But the Upper Caste used the term Hindu mercilessly and became successful in bringing the Lower Caste people behind them.

After this the Upper Caste became the default "representatives" and "leaders" of all Hindus including the Lower Caste. They also achieved the second most important objective of these riots… To implant the idea in Muslims mind that they cannot live peacefully with Hindus any more in a united India. They were deliberately sowing the seeds of partition of India. Here I am not talking about ordinary Upper Caste Hindu person, I am only talking about the top leadership of mainly Upper Caste Hindus.

So, after two decades of killings and lootings by the Upper Caste incited "Hindu" mobs, Muslims were forced to find an alternative to live peacefully by demanding a separate state for them. What a clever plan it was, it forced the Muslims of India to work hard to actually achieve the goal of the Upper Caste. Quide-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah who was once a champion of Hindu Muslim unity was so disgusted and disappointed by these people's behavior that he found no other alternative except to demand a separate state for Muslims. And during all these struggles he still kept the option open for Muslims to live in a united India. But Nehru and Indian National Congress (which was dominated by the Upper Caste) stayed on their course and refused to provide any opportunity to Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah and Muslims of India to back out from their demand of a separate state, thus succeeding in creating Pakistan. Jaswant Singh is wrong when he says in his book that Nehru and other congressional leaders were "lacking realism and had no foresight, purpose or will". On the contrary these Hindu leaders knew exactly what they were doing and they succeeded in accomplishing what they planned. And their attitude is so clear that even Jaswant Singh gets suspicious of them "... Jinnah did not win Pakistan, as the Congress leaders - Nehru and Patel finally conceded Pakistan to Jinnah, with the British acting as an ever helpful midwife," Jaswant Singh says in his 669-page book. You see, Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah and All India Muslim League accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan which provided federal structure for a United India with protections for minorities, but Nehru and Congress cold-bloodedly rejected it because they were not interested in a United India anymore. Abul Kalam Azad in his book 'India wins freedom’ argues that the partition of India could have been avoided if Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Patel had shown some flexibility over the Cabinet Mission Plan.

Originally it was Choudhary Rahmat Ali who coined the name "Pakistan" for a Muslim homeland in North-Western part of India, he also named "Bang-i-Islam" for a Muslim homeland in the Bengal, and "Usmanistan" for a Muslim homeland in the Deccan. But in the Lahore Resolution of 1940 the name Pakistan was not mentioned. Knowing that the nomenclature was very important, just as the term "Hindu" given by Muslims to the natives of India helped Upper Caste to assemble all of them together as Hindus, so the Upper Caste knew the impact of a "name", because it helps make an idea to come alive. In their mind the Muslim masses might not be as motivated to give life for implementing a ‘resolution’ as they would be for a country called "Pakistan". Till 1942 the All India Muslim League leadership had not used the term Pakistan, but when the two Hindu communal newspapers sarcastically mentioned that the Lahore Resolution was a resolution for the creation of Pakistan and the movement by the All India Muslim League was a movement for Pakistan, the Quaid-i-Azam accepted it. He declared that if they called it a Pakistan movement, then let it be so. I am not saying that if those Hindu newspapers would not have called it a "Pakistan movement" then eventually it would not have become a movement for Pakistan and Muslims would not have given their lives for it, but my point is that the Upper Caste used all kinds of prompting and nudging and pushing and did whatever they could to help create Pakistan while at the same time acted as if they were against it.

Now how the creation of Pakistan benefited the Upper Caste?

The answer to this question is simple: Without creating Pakistan the Upper Caste could not have come to power in India. Period.

Riots made 5% population of Upper Caste the leader of nearly 55% population of all Hindus, and the creation of Pakistan made them ruler of over 70% population of the undivided British India. Those Muslims who stayed in India were ironically blamed and punished for creating Pakistan and were openly discriminated against in every field. Riots engineered after the partition had devastated Muslims in India and kept them poor and helpless. This helped the Upper Caste in consolidating their position in power. In every branch of government they became the decision maker and controlled all the policy matters even when they were still a small minority in the new divided India.

How the united India could have hurt the Upper Caste?

If the Upper Caste had not played the "Hindu-Muslim riot card" and Pakistan was not created then, Muslims who were nearly 40% of the total Indian population and who had ruled India for over a thousand years could have easily formed a government. It is obvious that everyone would prefer to make alliance with 40% than rather with 5%. Muslims could have easily made alliance with the lower caste and ruled over India forever. Therefore Muslims would be dominating in the united India's government and in all other fields and the Upper Caste would have got nothing or very little. All policy matters whether domestic or foreign would have been decided by the Muslims.

So you have to admit that the Upper Caste were extremely successful in adopting and executing the "Hindu-Muslim riot" plan and the "divide India" plan and they gained maximum benefit from these plans, and they are where they are today because of these two very cleverly designed and executed plans.

British participation in creating Pakistan:

British realized early on that they will not be able to rule over India for a very long time, sooner or later they will have to leave, but who will they give the power to when they leave? They took power from Muslims but they were never going to give it back to the Muslims or even allowing a situation in which Muslims could gain power later on. Therefore, even if they handed over power to say Indian National Congress, then, what guarantee was there that Muslims will not come to power later on by making alliances with other communities. This door needed to be shut permanently; therefore the division of India was necessary. An additional short-term benefit to divide India was that the two created countries will fight with one another which will keep sub-continent week and by default Britain stronger. But in my opinion the main reason for Britain to divide India was to make sure that the main power goes and remains into the hands of the Upper Caste Hindus, and Muslims should never come close to it.

The "western" participation in creating Pakistan:

Here I will use terms not commonly used in the so-called mainstream media articles. But these things are facts and they exist, also remember that early 20th century was the time just after the Zionists appeared on earth.

After British captured India in 1857 the Jews realized that now the Muslims are on their way out, Europeans have not only taken over control of the new world i.e. Americas, Australia etc., but now they are taking control of the old world too, and soon they will rule the whole world. So they decided to make alliance with them, but alliance with whom... Pope? Britain? America? Who? Well they decided to make alliance with the most powerful yet hidden power in the west. The Freemasons! After their deal with the Freemasons, Zionists appeared in 1890s, then all the restrictions on Jewish businesses were lifted, the ceilings were removed and then the newly created Jewish Zionists could go as high as they wanted and in any business they wished. For example you see, today Rothschild of London controls not just the US Federal Reserve but monetary systems of nearly all the countries of the world and nobody makes a sound. On the other hand the west could not tolerate the rise of BCCI and decapitated it just after the end of cold war when BCCI lost its usefulness for CIA, and primarily because it was owned by Muslims.

In the beginning of 20th century a similar deal was made with the Upper Caste and plans were made to make them the rulers of the sub-continent. To accomplish this goal, things were put into motion to carve out a separate state for Muslims which will decimate the political power of the leftover Muslims in India, their huge population would be marginalized and would mean nothing in the divided India. At the same time the new Muslim country will be weakened systematically with the help of Freemasonry powers, and then it will be divided, and then sub-divided and weakened some more and then eventually rendered useless by becoming a bunch of colonies of India. Thus the huge Muslims population of united India (today it is over 550 million) which could have ruled India will be divided into pieces and will have little or no political influence over anything. After that the Upper Caste will not only rule supreme over the whole sub-continent but their influence will spread beyond this region, and they will play their vital role in the establishment of the New World Order. So this was not just a British plan but it also had the blessings of the international Freemasonry.

How this plan has worked so far?

If you look at the sub-continent today the things are going exactly as they were planned. East Pakistan has already become Bangladesh blocking Bengali Muslims from playing any significant role in the world or even in regional power politics. The leftover Pakistan has been weakened by installing dictators and corrupt politicians and when possible by using sanctions and trade barriers. Today there is an all-out attack on Pakistan by using drones and sending RAW trained PTT terrorists and Blackwater/Xe mercenaries. While India has been protected and peace in India is not supposed to be disturbed, Pakistan has been made into an open game. India can send as many terrorists as they want from US controlled Afghanistan, explode as many bombs, kill as many people as they possibly can, with impunity. Nuclear deal for India while Af-Pak Doctrine and Kerry-Lugar Bill for Pakistan are clear evidence that the plan for which India was divided is on its tracks and is going full speed ahead.

There are hundreds of examples which I can present here which will clearly show how America (a known Freemasonry power) has played its role in attempting to destroy Pakistan. Things that do not make any sense have happened, and are still happening. During Cuban missile crisis when Pakistan was one of the first country to be attacked by USSR because Pakistan had given a base to US near Peshawar, most of the northwest Pakistan would have evaporated and would have become inhabitable if USSR had launched nuclear missile strikes on that part of Pakistan where the US base was located. But what the US did in return... conspiracy and treachery! From Agartala conspiracy case, to stopping Pakistan from taking over Kashmir during India-China war, to putting sanctions when Pakistan needed the help most. These are the things the US did to Pakistan, they knew that India was making nuclear bomb but made no noise, but then after Indian nuclear test in 1974 when Pakistan wanted nuclear bomb only to protect itself, look what they did and what they are still doing to Pakistan, who they claim is their very close ally, a "Non-NATO Ally". I can go on and on and on, I can even write a book about American treachery against Pakistan. But here I just wanted to present a brief picture of how the Freemasonry powers have attempted to destroy Pakistan and help India, for the reasons I have stated above.

Now, by the term 'destroy Pakistan', I do not mean that the Upper Caste and their allies want India to takeover Pakistan and make it an integral part of India. NO... they do not want this to happen, because if Pakistan and Bangladesh get absorbed in India, and India becomes the "Akhand Bharat", then this will only hurt the Upper Caste. Because then it will be the same old situation all over again, Muslims will become the biggest voting block and they could eventually take over the power. So how could they allow this to happen? Therefore no matter how much propaganda the Upper Caste leaders make about the Akhand Bharat, they are not interested in it at all. Even if the Muslims of Pakistan and Bangladesh beg to become part of India, the Upper Caste leadership will not allow it to happen. They will find reasons and create means to stop it from happening, just like they always come-up with reasons and delaying tactics when they do the so-called "dialogue" with Pakistan. Pakistan and India have been doing these dialogues for decades, have these talks ever taken us anywhere? No! So, Akhand Bharat is also just a propaganda to fool the public, while actually they want to keep India divided and Muslims to be more divided into several Indian (Upper Caste) controlled satellite states.

And I am also sure that India became a close friend and ally of USSR mainly to block Pakistan from having any close friendship with Soviet Union. Since Freemasons had no control over USSR, therefore it was important for both India and United States to make sure that Pakistan does not have any powerful country like USSR as its close friend and ally and protector, because this will defeat the whole purpose. Therefore, with prior understanding between India and Unites States, India made all efforts to become a "close friend and ally of USSR", that is why we see no anger in the west against India having such a close relationship with Soviet Union even in the times of extreme tension during cold war. Ironically after Pakistan gave an air base to USA near Peshawar, Pakistan foolishly put the final nail in the coffin of any possible Pakistan-USSR friendship or treaty. It was a pretty well thought out diplomatic plot by both India and United States, and it worked out very well for them.

Part II

Who else participated in creating Pakistan:

After reading all this, one would argue why the Muslims of India would even want a separate country for themselves. Well, in my opinion the answer is simple: This was also the will of Allah (SWT).

Allah says in the Quran "they planned and Allah planned, and Allah is the best of planner".

When Pharaoh was killing all the baby boys of the children of Israel, it was Allah (SWT) who defeated his plans. Allah says in Surah Al-Qasas:

[28.7] And We revealed to Musa's mothers, saying: "Suckle him, then when you fear for him, cast him into the river and do not fear nor grieve; surely We will bring him back to you and make him one of the messengers."

[28.8] And Pharaoh's family took him up that he might become an enemy and a grief for them; surely Pharaoh and Haman and their hosts were wrongdoers.

God Almighty Allah (SWT) is 'All Knowing' -- This mean; He knows everything which has happened in the past, He knows everything which is happening in the present, and He also knows everything which will happen in the future. Therefore, Allah (SWT) already knew that the Upper Caste and their allies will do this, so when the enemies of Islam were planning the demise of Muslims in India, Allah (SWT) has already planned that a Muslim state be created which will "become an enemy and a grief for them" and bring an end to the dreams of these clever Upper Cast and their co-conspirators. And so we see the hints of this plan in the ahadith of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). One can argue that so far these statements don't appear to be holding much water, but as you will read further and also as the time will progress you will see how beautifully these statements apply.

It was because of the will of Allah (SWT), that we saw people like Allama Mohammad Iqbal appear on the national horizon and started to prepare the minds of Muslims to create a seperate homeland for the Muslims of India, and in his writings and specially in his poetry he was not just inspiring the Muslims to create this new country, but he was also informing them about the greater purpose of that country. It was Allama Iqbal who called upon Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah to lead the Muslims of India to achive this goal. Even though Allama Iqbal died in 1938, long before the creation of Pakistan, but it was his teaching which remained an important force behind the creation of Pakistan. And after the Lahore Resolution of March 1940 the struggle for the creation of Muslim homeland intensified, and Muslims started to give more and more sacrifices, and eventually after sacrificing nearly two million lives, Muslims finally got a new country for themselves. Then in the morning of 27th of Ramadan and during Lailatul-Qadr, on 14th August 1947 Pakistan came into being.

The sacrifices which were given for the creation of Pakistan were immense, many many books have been written on this topic and it is a subject on its own, all I would say here is that it is surely because of those sacrifices that Allah (SWT) has been protecting Pakistan from the evil planning of its enemies.

Why Allah will protect Pakistan?:

Allah (SWT) says in Surah Al-e-Imran [3:157] And if you are slain in the way of Allah or you die, certainly forgiveness from Allah and mercy is better than what they amass.
And in Surah Al-Hajj [22.58] Those who leave their homes in the cause of Allah, and are then slain or die: On them will Allah bestow verily a goodly Provision: Truly Allah is He Who bestows the best provision.

This tells us the high status of Shaheeds in the eyes of Allah (SWT). So you see, when we have about 2 million martyrs (shaheeds), and these shaheeds are so beloved in the eyes of Allah, then how can Allah will let the fruit of their sacrifices go to waste. Therefore I can say with certainty that if Pakistan was not protected by the creator of the heavens and the earth, then Pakistan would not have existed by now. And as per our enemies plans; 2006 was supposed to be the last year for Pakistan.

A Short history of Pakistan:

Soon after its creation, Pakistan started to face difficulties. First India attacked Kashmir and Pakistan had to fight this war without any army or any adequate resources, then within the same year its founder Mohammad Ali Jinnah passed away, and then its first Prime Minister was assassinated (we still don't know who did this and why), its parliamentary system never delivered, military intervened several times, but even they didn't perform well. (for more see Part I) And because of these issues Pakistan's enemies got the opportunity and they severed its eastern wing in 1971. It was a setback to the two nation theory, but if we look back, Choudhary Rahmat Ali named "Pakistan" for a Muslim homeland in North-Western part of India, and he named "Bang-i-Islam" for a Muslim homeland in the Bengal, and "Usmanistan" for a Muslim homeland in the Deccan. So in that respect Pakistan still remained intact.

It was India who first conducted the nuclear test (Pokhran I) in Rajasthan on May 18, 1974. Pakistan was caught off guard, and to survive Pakistan had to start working on its own nuclear bomb. When Z.A.Bhutto initiated the nuclear project, he immediately came under severe pressure from the west, especially from the United States. The most famous and direct threat came from Henry Kissinger who threatened Bhutto for pushing forward on Pakistan's nuclear program, telling him: “We will make a horrible example of you”. Then during an uprising after 1977 allegedly rigged general elections Z.A.Bhutto was removed from the office and then later hanged on a murder charge.

In 1979 Iran saw a great Islamic revolution. This was the end result of the overthrow of a democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran, Mussadaq in 1953 by CIA and British Intelligence, and then subsequent installation of a brutal dictator, the Shah of Iran, who ruled Iran with an iron fist using the notorious secret police "Sawak". The dictator was overthrown and to protect Iran from a counter coup the American embassy staff were made hostage, and then all ties between Unites States and Iran were broken.

Seeing the obviously weak position of America in the region and vulnerable position of Pakistan, Soviet Union moved into Afghanistan with the intension of eventually rolling into Pakistan's Baluchistan province to fulfill its dream of getting access to the warm waters. That dream was a nightmare for Pakistan and this was one of the most dangerous times for Pakistan whose integrity and perhaps even existence was at stake. The world and the west made a lot of noise about the Soviet invasion, but since Soviet Union was a superpower, they couldn't do much, and in a way conceded Afghanistan to the Soviet Union. But Afghan nation is composed of some amazingly brave people, they raised their arms against the occupation forces of a superpower, and when the world saw how these brave people were putting up resistance against a brutal and powerful enemy, they started to turn around and started offering help. Pakistan had no choice but to help the Afghan resistance, and then soon Mujahideen from different parts of the world started to arrive to participate in this Jihad. American aid played an important role but it was limited to arms and some financial aid. It was the belief in Allah and bravery of Afghan Mujahideen which lead to the defeat of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. If the Afghan and other Mujahedeen had not defeated the Soviet Union then within a decade or so Pakistan would have lost its Baluchistan province and it could even be worse.

Soon after the brave people of Afghanistan and Mujahideen defeated Soviet forces, the Soviet Union collapsed and disintegrated. The first victim of their disintegration was Iraq. Saddam was trapped in Kuwait very shrewdly by the George H W Bush administration. Osama bin Laden and other Mujahideen offered their services to oust Saddam from Kuwait because they knew that if American military comes to this region then they will not leave. How correct they were in their assessment. But they were marginalized by the puppet Arab governments who even barred them from coming back to their own homes in their own home countries. This made them do what they should not have done, which is to launch terrorist attacks against America like embassy bombing etc. It was these acts which helped America to use their names not just against them but also against the whole Islamic world.

The second victim of the disintegration of Soviet Union was Pakistan. Even though it was clear that Pakistan's nuclear program was purely defensive in nature, but instead of helping their good and true friend Pakistan who always helped United States and played a critical role in Afghanistan making United States the only superpower of the world, the USA said 'Thank You' by putting sanctions on Pakistan and punishing Pakistan in many ways; the list is very long. But despite all of their conspiracies and sanctions, Pakistan was able to build nuclear bombs, and successfully tested them right after India did its second nuclear testing (Pokhran II) in May 1998.

Arrival of The New World Order:

Some other consequences of the disintegration of Soviet Union were:

The New World Order was revived by George Bush senior; Samuel P. Huntington wrote the Clash of Civilizations; PNAC came up with the policy of "pre-emptive" wars by persuading the American public using deception like in their famous statement: "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor."
Then came the 9/11... The mother of all false flag attacks.

Encyclopedia defines: False flag operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time.

(See Appendix A for more details about 9/11)

In his book "The Grand Chessboard" written in 1998 (just 3 years before 9/11) Zbigniew Brzezinski writes: "Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (p. 211)

Please remember that Brzezinski later became Obama campaign's top foreign policy adviser.

And according to his resume, Zbigniew Brzezinski is a Trustee and founder of the “Trilateral Commission”.

The 9/11 was the opening salvo of the attacks to come on the Muslim lands. But why on the Muslim lands? To understand this, one must know and understand the parties involved and their objectives and their underlying motivations. These parties are:

I. Freemasons

Freemasons (previously known as Knight Templars) arose from obscure origins in the late 16th to early 17th century. Anyone can become a Freemasons; the only requirement is a belief in a "Supreme Being". For the lower level Freemason this Supreme Being can mean the Christian Trinity to a Christian Mason, Allah to a Muslim Mason, Brahma to a Hindu Mason, etc. In the rituals, the Supreme Being is referred to as the "Great Architect of the Universe", which alludes to the use of architectural symbolism within Freemasonry. Also keep in mind the true nature of this Supreme Being and other secrets are not told until one reaches the higher degrees of Freemasonry.

Albert Pike, who was 33rd degree Grand Commander of US Freemasonry from 1859-1891 writes in his book 'Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry': "Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!"

So you see... this Supreme Being is Lord Lucifer (aka Shaitaan) which they worship. So Freemasons are Luciferian.

Some other quotes written by high level Masons praising Lucifer (with references):

‘The Mysteries Of Magic’ by Eliphas Levi "What is more absurd and more impious than to attribute the name of Lucifer to the devil, that is, to personified evil. The intellectual Lucifer is the spirit of intelligence and love; it is the paraclete, it is the Holy Spirit, while the physical Lucifer is the great agent of universal magnetism." page 428.

‘The Secret Doctrine' by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky "Lucifer represents.. Life.. Thought.. Progress.. Civilization.. Liberty.. Independence.. Lucifer is the Logos.. the Serpent, the Savior." on pages 171, 225, 255 (Volume II)

"It is Satan who is the God of our planet and the only God." pages 215, 216, 220, 245, 255, 533, (Volume VI)

And Albert Pike's Instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the World, July 14, 1889. Recorded by A.C. De La Rive in La Femme et l'Enfant dans la FrancMaconnerie Universelle on page 588
"That which we must say to a crowd is - We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us imitates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay whose deeds prove his cruelty, perdify and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil."

This is the key: Adonay or Adonai is the God of Abraham in Hebrew Torah, who we Muslim call Allah. The Freemason believe that Lucifer loves human beings, while Adonai (the real God) do not, and wanted humans to stay in darkness. That's why Lucifer rebelled against Adonai when he saw what a tyrant God was against the humans that he had himself created. Lucifer gave knowledge to humans, the knowledge between good and evil. Lucifer was therefore condemned to earth by Adonai for helping humans. This is the reason they want to acknowledge the sacrifice of Lucifer by establishing the New World Order, where they will bring the pure doctrine of Lord Lucifer out into the public view. And since we Muslims are not likely to accept this, that is why we are needed to be attacked and subdued before that time.

So now one can understand why they are targeting only the Muslim countries, and then even blame us for it.

Please also note that about one third of the American presidents were Freemason.

II. Illuminati

This movement was founded in May 1776, as the Order of the Illuminati. The movement is claimed to be made up of "freethinkers as an offshoot of the Enlightenment", but seems to have been modeled after Freemasonry. Today the Illuminati refers to a tightly organized network of family dynasties representing Anglo American and European aristocracy and Jewish finance joined by intermarriage, belief in the occult, and hatred of Islam and Allah.

It is believed that major world events are being controlled and manipulated by this secret society, because many influential people were and are members of the Illuminati. Several presidents of the United States who are known to be Freemason are considered to be also

One famous Illuminati member is David Rockefeller, who was also the Chairman of The Council On Foreign Relations. It was David Rockefeller who stated at a UN Business Conference, on Sept. 14, 1994 . . .

"This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

III. Bilderberg

In May 1954 the most powerful men in the world met for the first time under the auspices of the Dutch royal crown and the Rockefeller family in the luxurious Hotel Bilderberg in Holland. Since then the Bilderberg Group, or Bilderberg Club is an annual, invitation-only conference of approximately 150 powerful people from North America and Western Europe, most of whom are people of influence from military, government and private corporations, and many of them are member of CFR (Council On Foreign Relations). Despite so many influential people gathering at one place to decide the future of the world, there is no news about it, there is complete silence and blackout in the media, including Muslim and Pakistani media, which claim to be free, yet lack the courage to inform its readers, audiences and viewers.

IV. Zionists

As mentioned in Part 1, when the Jews saw the decline of Muslim power in the world they joined hands with the Freemasons and started the Zionist movement to create Israel (probably to also fulfill the prophesy of Albert Pike). Zionism was founded by Theodor Herzl in 1896 whose goal was the return of Jews to Eretz Yisrael, or Zion, the Jewish synonym for Jerusalem and the Land of Israel. The name of "Zionism" comes from the hill Zion, the hill on which the Temple of Jerusalem was situated, and supporters of Zionism are called Zionists.

Interestingly the aim of this movement is totally opposite of the Jewish belief of diaspora (exile) and their fundamental belief in "Divine Redemption". In the year 587 B.C.E. the kingdom of Judea was conquered by the Babylonians, who destroyed the temple in Jerusalem and exiled a large part of the Jewish population to Babylonia. Jews believe that this happened as a punishment from God Almighty and the exile was a Divine Decree, and Jews need to stay in exile until the Messiah comes and creates the real State of Israel, only after that the Jews could emerge from exile. Therefore many Orthodox Jews call the current state of Israel as a Zionist State or FAKE Israel.

For reference here are some Jewish websites:

Christian Zionists: A lot of people make the mistake of thinking that the terms Jews and Zionists are synonymous. This is not at all correct. Not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jews. In fact, some of the most ardent and most powerful Zionists are Christian fundamentalists, aka Christian Zionists.

Hindu Zionists: After Israel's creation in 1948 the Upper Caste Hindus openly supported Zionism, and as per the definition they can be termed as "Hindu Zionists". An international opinion survey has shown that India is the most pro-Israel country in the world. Today all conservative Indian parties and organizations support Zionism, and the nexus between India, Israel and America is quite obvious now.

Just like Jewish Zionists and Jews who were brought up and placed at important and key positions in corporations, media and government in the beginning of last century, we are now seeing the repeat of the same thing in this century with the Hindu Zionists. While Arabs and Muslims have lived in United States (Detroit area) for nearly a hundred years, but they were never given any important jobs. But Hindus who are a relatively new comers in United States have very quickly been pumped up not just in corporations and news media but also in key government offices too. Too many US Senators and Congressmen now have Indian Hindus in their staff. So now if Pakistan wants to lobby its case in the US congress, then they first have to lick the boots of Kumars and Guptas and Malhotras, and these people are already biased as compared to ordinary white or black Americans. Therefore the chance of success of a Pakistani lobby efforts in the presence of Hindu Zionists is the same as it has been for the Palestinian lobby efforts in the presence of Jewish Zionists. Which is next to zero.

Here I would like to mention that there will be a lot of heartbreaks among Muslims, specially Pakistanis, since they grew up knowing and loving United States as a friend and an ally. They will not be able to accept and digest this fact that the era of close friendship with United States is now over. It is no longer the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s, the times have changed, and they are not going to turn back.

V. The Organizations

There are many organizations which are working in tandem for the NWO.

• Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). This is one of the few overt Luciferian organization, rest of them are covert.

• Trilateral Commission.

• Bilderberg.

• Federal Reserve. The only thing federal about it is its name, otherwise it is a group of 12 private banks.

"Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders."

– The Honorable Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1930s

There are many other organizations like Rand Corporation, Ford Foundation and Royal Institute of International Affairs etc., who are also working for the same NWO cause.

The purpose of all the parties mentioned above is one... Establishment of the New World Order.

But what is this New World Order?

The New World Order is a diabolical plan created by the Luciferian cabal and financial elite in order to destroy the national sovereignty of the governments of the world through economic blackmail and world conflicts with the goal of enslaving humankind in a One World Government and One World Religion (of Lord Lucifer). You better believe it !

Between 1859 and 1871, Albert Pike worked out a military blueprint for three world wars...

He said that the first war would establish Communism in Russia. The second would take advantage of the differences between "the Fascists and the Jews" and would weaken Christendom while empowering Communism and Judaism. The third War would take advantage of the differences between Judaism and Islam and would ensure that both destroy each other. After the third big war, the people of the world will embrace Lucifer: "Without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, [the people] will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view."

These are not my statements, these are the statements of Albert Pike, who was the Grand Commander of US Freemasonry, and they give some important clues about what is going on this earth today. I am not saying that Albert Pike had the power to predict the future, but what I am saying is that it is his followers who are trying their best to create scenarios according to the guidelines of Albert Pike, who possess a very high rank in their religion, just like prophets and saints have in other religion. At this point some people will be shaking their heads in disbelief, to them all I can say is that a little research and study will confirm what I have written here, but if you chose not to, then be happy because ignorance is bliss.

So, this is the plan... The alliance made with the Jewish Zionists was for the purpose that the Zionists will provide support in the establishment of the NWO. And when they approached the Upper Caste Hindus they said "We have gazillions of gods already, accepting one or two more gods wouldn't really matter much. We will surely help you.". And to gain the support of Japanese elites/ Buddhists the Trilateral Commission was formed. Lately most of the manufacturing jobs have been outsourced to China to woe the Chinese elites and Buddhists. Why I am including the term Buddhists here? Because in Buddhism there are many gods which makes it easy for a person of Buddhist background to accept Lucifer as a god.

Luciferian Plans against Muslims:

The only two groups of people these Luciferians fear who will not accept Lord Lucifer are true Christians and Muslims. To pacify and control the Christians they have infiltrated in their Churches, weakened their families, destroyed their values and lately brought them to their knees by using economic recession and joblessness.

For the Muslims they have designed the hammer. They don't have to use this hammer on the entire Muslim population all over the world. You see, the area from Egypt to Pakistan can be considered as the Islamic heartland. They believe that if they pulverize the Muslim population of this Islamic heartland long and hard enough, without giving any relief, then eventually Muslims of this region will get frustrated from their God, Allah, who they will find is unable to help them, and then finally they will get disappointed and demoralized, and then will throw up their arms and surrender, back away from their religious practices, adopt western lifestyles, start drinking alcohol, allow their daughters to sleep around with whoever they want, accept gay marriages etc etc etc. Then these Luciferians will have no issues with the “Muslims” any more. We will then be their brothers, all the jobs outsourced to India and China will come to this region. Hajj will be replaced by a giant Disney amusement park with a lot of fun. With huge influx of money from Luciferian powers while at the same time disappointed from their own god, Muslims will find themselves directionless and anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, [the Muslims] will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.

Sounds familiar? Well... This is the hammer they have designed for the Muslims of the Islamic heartland.

What the Muslims of other regions would be doing to help the Muslims of the heartland?

Well... Muslim countries west of Egypt have little or no military power, and Muslim countries east of Pakistan are separated be a giant power 'India', so all they could do is huff and puff, but for how long? With the Islamic heartland gone, they will also slowly change and become the same. Same thing with the Muslim population north of this region i.e. Turkey and Central Asian republics. The present Turkish government is visibly pro-Islamic and is doing a terrific job, but when I analyze the hadiths of our Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), it breaks my heart when I see that in the future probably because of the army, or the lure and pressure of EU/NATO etc, the country appears to fall back into the hands of pro-European and secular forces (munafiqoon).

The current state and behavior of the whole Muslim ummah is also such that it does not discourage Kuffar from attempting any kind of assault on Muslim lands.
There is a very famous hadith in Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 37, Number 4284; Narrated by Thawban:

The Prophet (PBUH) said: "The people will soon summon one another to attack you as people when eating invite others to share their dish. Someone asked: Will that be because of our small numbers at that time? He replied: No, you will be numerous at that time: but you will be scum and rubbish like that carried down by a torrent, and Allah will take fear of you from the breasts of your enemy and put wahn (enervation) into your hearts. Someone asked: What is wahn (enervation) O apostle of Allah (PBUH)? He replied: 'Love of the world and dislike of death'."

And if we look at the UN Security Council, many times it does look like a dining room where they invite each other for dinner and the dishes are mostly Muslim countries and their natural resources. So, when the hammer will be falling on Muslims in the heartland the Muslims outside the heartland will be just watching helplessly.

You would be saying... Wow! What a story you made here. My answer is that I have not made up anything. I will present evidence from Quran and Hadith to prove whatever I am presenting here. And let me make it clear. I am not predicting anything here, as a Muslim it is wrong to predict anything, because only Allah (SWT) has the knowledge of the future. I am doing something similar to what a meteorologist do by forecasting tomorrow's weather based on the today's weather and existing data and conditions. And as they weight their forecast by including a percentage, meaning if the chance of rain is 90% then it is highly likely, but if it is 20% then the chance of rain is small. Similarly I will weigh my forecasts too.

To put their plan into action and to start the next phase of the project, the Luciferians will do the 'next 9/11'.

The next 9/11:

This is a serious topic, but I am starting it on a lighter note from "The Onion", which is a news satire organization. In one of their satirical article they presented a "press conference of Michael Chertoff and Michael Hayden held in January 2009":

"WASHINGTON— In an alarming development with wide-reaching implications for America's safety, Department of Homeland Security head Michael Chertoff and CIA Director Michael Hayden issued a joint report Monday warning that the next 9/11 could in fact occur on a different date. The report, based on intelligence gathered by field-agents, found that a future 9/11 might take place on an entirely new month and day, including 4/24, 6/13, or even 10/12. According to the report, the nation could realistically find itself in the midst of a 5/25 scenario, as well as a potential 3/14 situation in the months to come. 8/28, 6/19, and 11/7 were also cited as possible 9/11s. "1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5," Chertoff continued for nearly 45 minutes, "12/28, 12/29, 12/30, 12/31—these are all plausible and serious threats."

Furthermore, the 350-page document rejected long-held beliefs that the next 9/11 would commence at 8:46 a.m. on a sunny Tuesday morning. In fact, it warns that a future attack could occur on a cloudy, snowy, or even brisk day, at 8:53 a.m., 10:42 p.m., or any one of the other 1,440 known times."

Here is the link for more: http://www.theonion.com/articles/terror-experts-warn-next-911-could-fall-on-differe,2633/

But here is the thing... When the main idea is to manufacture the truth, which is what is done in a "Flase Flag attack", then the line between a funny & satirical news and a real & serious news (whether coming from websites or print media or broadcast) gets blurred. As far as "9/11" and "next 9/11" is concerned, there is a jungle out there.

In the New York Observer magazine there was an article named: "In Danny Pearl Book, Lévy Says Next 9/11 Brewing in Pakistan", written by Ron Rosenbaum. This article predicts the next 9/11 in these words:

"'It will make 9/11 look prehistoric,' Mr. Lévy says. What he learned in investigating the death of Wall Street Journal reporter Pearl, he contends, brought him face to face with the specter of the next 9/11. From the year he spent studying the jihadist alliance in Pakistan that killed Pearl, he has a theory about the nature of "the next 9/11".

He believes it is likely to take the shape of a terrorist nuclear attack from inside Pakistan.


This is a few years old report but it shows their mind set:

WASHINGTON, May 22: A top American general (Gen David Petraeus) on Thursday endorsed a US intelligence assessment that the next 9/11-type attack on the US soil would come from Al Qaeda bases in Pakistan’s tribal region but urged the United States to increase its security assistance to the country to help it deal with the threat.

[Syed M. Hoda is a Writer and Researcher. He can be contacted at shoda@hotmail.com]

Donate to Sustain IMO

IMO Search

IMO Visitors